On Jan 6, 2008 8:23 PM, Ralph Shumaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Carl Lowenstein wrote:
> >
> > This opened a can of worms, ending with a contest to see whose system
> > had the most commands available. The short answer is that there is no
> > easy reference to obscure commands. How do you want to define
> > "obscure"?
> >
> > To get closer to the question about "system-config-printer", that
> > program has no man.page. Nor do many of the RedHat configuration GUI
> > adjuncts. A quick look around shows this:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ locate bin/system-config | wc -l
> > 35
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ locate system-config | grep man[1-9] | wc -l
> > 6
> >
> > You can do this yourself without the "wc -l" step and look at the results.
> >
> > carl
> >
>
> I don't think I need to on this specific thing. But thanks. That's a
> good formula. You answered my question as to whether or not "man
> system-config-print.[1-9]" would tell me if it was unwise to use
> system-config-print with the newer preferable cups driver.
>
> Just out of curiosity, why did you not include n? [1-9n]
Well, because I didn't think of it. Also didn't think of the
possibility of /usr/share/man/manl.
But man.pages that come with the distributed OS would not belong
either in the "new" class or the "local" class. so I didn't miss
anything.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-newbie
