Joshua Penix wrote:
> 
> On Sep 26, 2006, at 11:08 AM, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> 
> >I have taken a copy of the currently installed mailman and placed  
> >it into
> >~root. I want to upgrade our mailman to the most recently released
> >version that Debian provides, test it, then go yell at people if it  
> >fals
> >my checks.
> 
> Am I reading the system wrong?  It appears that mailman-2.1.5-8sarge2  
> is what is already installed, and that's the version that you placed  
> in ~root.  Also, p.d.o seems to think that 2.1.5-8sarge3 is the  
> current version, which is the version I thought we weren't getting  
> due to the hold.

Correct.

> And neither 8sarge2 nor 8sarge3 address the security vulnerability  
> that Neil originally posted about.

Potentially correct. I have not tested 8sarge3 but I suspect that it
will also fail.

> >If mailman breaks, in theory I could re-install the version that is
> >currently installed and everything will Just Work. This is the same
> >theory that states that everything will Just Work right after the
> >upgrade, so no downgrade will be required. Comforting theory, no?
> 
> I like it. :)  If it does not Just Work I will be happy to help  
> investigate the problem.

Good. We have one expert on board.

> Is it possible to remove the apt-get toolset so as to force us to use  
> aptitude?  My fingers need some help sometimes, and I have no  
> objection to aptitude.

I am pretty sure apt-get is considered Essential, so, no.

> >Any objections to the mailman upgrade?
> 
> If my paragraph above about the version does not apply, then go ahead  
> and apply whatever is current.  This will be a good test run for the  
> *next* upgrade we'll have to do when the actual fix for Neil's  
> vulnerability finally comes through (what's up Debian Security team???).

Well...


-john

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer

Reply via email to