James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
>..
> adding more mamber and possible public benefits.

 s/mamber/member/

> 
> - - -
> 
> Too much PR?
> Enough history? -- rationale?
> Phrasing improvements?
> Need to tell fraction of treasury?
> Does it serve the purpose?
> 
> All editorial suggestions welcome!

I should have explicitly invited spelling, grammar, and factual
corrections, too. ;-)

..j

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer

Reply via email to