James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
> EVM seems to have said he is confirming the schedule.
> Doesn't seem we should need anything beyond that .. does it?
I agree. Don't know how I missed finding that in the second schedule. I guess
it got buried in the rest of the verbosity. Thats why I repost them here.
> ==> so does this mean we can replace the announced grunion run with a real
meeting announcement on the website?
Nobody seemed to notice or care to comment on this. I thought it was kind of
funny. Grunion don't run in the bay. Once again my attempt at humor fails.
> ..ummm, is there a presenter waiting in the wings?
Yes, San Le wants to present his fluid analysis program to the group again.
--
Neil Schneider pacneil_at_linuxgeek_dot_net
http://www.paccomp.com
Key fingerprint = 67F0 E493 FCC0 0A8C 769B 8209 32D7 1DB1 8460 C47D
"Work to eat, eat to live, live to bike, bike to work." -- Naomi Bloom
--
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
