(Fixing reply to go to kragen-discuss. Sigh, I guess I should fix that.) On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:03:47PM +0200, Danny Ayers wrote: > To be honest I'd forgotten their exact wording, and as you say it > makes a big difference. > > Tangentially the last comment here might amuse: > http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/2001/08/Praying-For-Satans-Soul.aspx?p=4 > > - I think you could derive from that while "Don't be evil" can't apply > to the devil (by definition), but "Don't do evil" must always apply > because he has no free will and hence is incapable of sin
That's an amusing hypothesis. But can a hypothetical person without free will either do or be evil? > re. Google - the vast majority of the individuals that work for them > I've encountered seem to have extremely good intentions, but > personally find the dominance of the company as a whole getting a bit > worrying. But I do use gmail. Yeah, I don't know quite what to do about that. Kragen -- To unsubscribe: http://lists.canonical.org/mailman/listinfo/kragen-discuss
