There are a couple of retractable trigear setups shown in the newsletter 
archives.

Chris

On 1/25/2015 10:23 AM, Chris Prata via KRnet wrote:
> not to mention "the unlikely event of a water landing"  lol
> thanks all info appreciated while I try to explore which way to go.
>
>> To: ml at n56ml.com; krnet at list.krnet.org
>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:06:02 +0100
>> Subject: Re: KR> Tri-Gear Retracts?
>> From: krnet at list.krnet.org
>>
>> Hi, check the website http://members.upc.nl/a.gremmen61/  At the pics 2005 
>> you can see the gear system of the cherry bx2. It is nice but also wat mark 
>> just noted, it will be add weight. The only positif I think is the dead 
>> engine outfield landing. It will save you from a tip over.
>> Stef
>>
>> --
>> Steph and his dad are building the KR-2S     see   
>> http://www.masttotaalconcept.nl/kr2
>>   
>>   
>>
>>
>>> ----Origineel Bericht----
>>> Van : krnet at list.krnet.org
>>> Datum : 25/01/2015 16:23
>>> Aan : krnet at list.krnet.org
>>> Onderwerp : Re: KR> Tri-Gear Retracts?
>>>
>>> Oh, and the most important reason to go with fixed gear (I can't believe
>>> I left this one out) is the GEAR-UP landing!  I built mine fixed because
>>> I knew if I had retracts, my first landing would be a gear-up landing,
>>> and my third, and my 10th...etc.  I later proved that theory, although I
>>> made it to 93 landings in my 68 year-old Swift before actually
>>> fulfilling that prophecy!
>>>
>>> There's another school of thought that if you have to land in a field
>>> because of an engine out, damage will be minimized.  In a smooth field
>>> big enough to pull that off, it's true.  But in the case of my hayfield
>>> landing, I needed all the friction I could get.  Without it I was going
>>> to hit a stand of trees that would have totaled the plane, if not me.
>>>
>>> I'm not trying to discourage you from building retracts or tri-gear
>>> retracts, but you've come to the table with lots of ideas on how to do
>>> things different, and they will all increase building time accordingly,
>>> perhaps exponentially.  That's fine, and I'm a poster child for the
>>> concept, but be prepared to spend a long time accomplishing all your
>>> goals. I'm certainly not saying to "build is by the plans", because the
>>> plans are lacking in many ways.  But choose your modifications
>>> carefully.  As William Wynne likes to say, every day spent building is
>>> another day you are closer to losing your medical.  Hopefully that issue
>>> will be relaxed soon, but you get the point.
>>>
>>> But as much as I enjoyed building and proving that I can improve the
>>> design and persevere to the end, I can tell you that flying is a lot
>>> more fun than building, at least for me!
>>>
>>> Mark Langford
>>> ML at N56ML.com
>>> http://www.n56ml.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
>>> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
>>> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>>> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
>>> options
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
>> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
>> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
>> options
>                                       
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options
>
>


Reply via email to