Very interesting they did an "exact copy" of the Ellison now per their
website.  They say on the website there was no vapor lock issues with their
Mk1.  I know of least two around here that has had it on more than one
occasion. Simply, the separate regulator did not benefit from the cooling of
the throttle body while air is passing through. Cooling air or a blast tube
is needed to keep it operating properly. That is why they copied the Ellison
exactly. 

While the idea of the built in "primer" and vapor lock release looks like a
good idea, I would caution against it.  Think about this...the primer is a
lever or button that presses on the diaphragm to allow fuel to flow, or
release any trapped air from the vapor lock. Depending on your installation,
the fuel may not stay in the carb. But that is a completely separate issue.
There are others I won't get into as well. Ideally a primer will send fuel
directly into the intake near the head or valves for best efficiency, and
separately from your fuel delivery system. The least amount of failure
points as possible should be the goal with fuel delivery. A quick look at
the NTSB reports reveal a high number of accidents are fuel related.

With the type of fuel delivery system on the Ellison and Rotec, the pressure
on the diaphragm opens the fuel inlet valve which allows the fuel to flow.
With their design you have a penetration through the pressure side of the
chamber, which requires some type of seal to maintain the pressure for the
opening of the valve. If that seal seeps or fails, you lose the pressure
required to provide fuel flow.  Not a good thing in flight.  Granted, they
make a good looking product. But in my opinion, this primer idea is an
accident waiting to happen. 

All the new EFS carbs will be CNC'd with some enhancements. The cost will
not be as much as in the past but more than the Rotec. We are making most
parts in house but for others it just does not make sense to purchase a
several thousand dollar multi axis CNC, especially when we are in the meca
of commercial and military aviation here in Southern California. The reason
they have one in house is from their engine facility. There is nowhere near
enough margin in these to justify the expense for just the carb
manufacturing. 

Steve Glover


Reply via email to