Matt, I guess I don't see the problem either unless you are trying to use a Dragon Fly canopy with a stock KR-2 canopy frame. I have a dragonfly canopy in the -2S frame on my plane built to the stock width. I used the forward part of the canopy, but could have (and maybe should have) used a bit more aft section of the canopy to provide a little better head room. If you are trying to use a stock KR-2 canopy frame, then that might be a bit of a problem.
-Jeff Scott Los Alamos, NM lots of photos of the plane and canopy at http://jeffsplanes.com ? ? Sent:?Thursday, October 06, 2016 at 10:35 AM From:?"Matt Quimby via KRnet" <krnet at list.krnet.org> To:?krnet at list.krnet.org Cc:?"Matt Quimby" <crazymonkey16 at ptd.net> Subject:?KR> Hm, canopy again... Well, I?m having some trouble with the canopy now. I?m using a standard Dragonfly canopy, and I have a stock width kr2. Bend the sides in, looks great. Headroom, forward visibility, blends well with the back deck? whoops. the curve from front to back lessens, to the point where I can only pick *two* of those three. I?ve enclosed a picture that demonstrates the difference between the Dragonfly at normal width and at the width I?m working with. Any of you guys that used Dragonfly canopies, can you please tell me how you made it work? I?m at a loss. Matt Quimby http://kr2pilot.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search[http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search].
