Herbert Not to be rude, but this has been discussed way more than it ever should have been with no conclusive conclusions as to which way to go, or which way a builder can go. A search of the archives will reveal a WHOLE bunch of band width on the subject. With due respect I would say check there and then do what you think is best. Lets not start this thread over again...
Colin N96TA Ormond Beach, FL > > From: [email protected] > Date: 2006/07/27 Thu PM 12:27:01 EDT > To: [email protected] > Subject: KR> Making KR ELSA > > Each KR is a unique aircraft not a production a/c or ELSA production. > Everyone sees that the LSA exceed the FAA weights, speed V max & V stall and > as far as I can see the FAA doesn't really make anyone PROVE that the > "numbers" conform. Its just hype! So that in reality someone can make a > "resembling, KR" a ELSA and license it that way. And because it has never > been a production a/c it IS and Experimental LSA it can practically described > as LSA and function beyond the limits published example is ANY LSA exceed > the specs: now just as the ULtra lights became HEAVY FAR 103's the facts are > history and I challenge any rhetoric comments to the making of all > "resembling, KR's" officially ELSA if that builder wants it that way! > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to [email protected] > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html >
