Dan, I took a look at the Swift Fuel web site. http://www.swiftenterprises.net/Swift%20Fuel.html
Hey it all sounds Wonderful to me. I wish for them all the success they can achieve in their desired final product, who wouldn't? The information I gave in my earlier post was according to a fellow involved in the chemical industry who is involved with a alternative development group himself, maybe Swift for all I know. He sure is Very Aware of what is happening with the Swift Fuel people and their lack of capability to this point. I passed along his statements about them and what is going on with the development of alternative unleaded aircraft fuels, Not my thoughts. He was not hopeful at all that they were going to be successful. That is all I know about it. Also according to him I do not think they have been able to produce very many gallons to test to this point. I am fairly sure that the $62.00 per gallon figure is what he said it would cost for that fuel based on current mfg capability. According to him, Swift is planning to sell shares of stock. If he is a big liar, then I can't help it. I did use the term laughable because according to this fellow they have only produced a few gallons so far. IF he is wrong then what can I say? One more time, all of this is according to him, not me, so please do not accuse me, the messenger as being the Negative One. I have seen a lot of people come along in my adult life time with all kinds of Fantastic ideas that never panned out, we can just hope, right? Larry Howell ________________________________ From: Dan Heath <da...@windstream.net> To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Mon, February 8, 2010 4:40:22 PM Subject: RE: KR> Bye Bye 100LL/ Swift Fuel I really thought that the KRNetters were better than this. Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC Why is it that there always has to be someone who finds it necessary to be negative even about something that could be so good? I don't get it.
