(I apologize for this and all my posts - I really over think things and often 
run down unproductive rabbit holes.  No wonder my first plane (an Osprey2) took 
almost 20 years to build.  I try to keep these ramblings to myself, but 
occasionally they creep out.)

Anyways...

I've been tormented over engine selection ever since my son started his KR 
project (https://hugheskr2s.yolasite.com <https://hugheskr2s.yolasite.com/>).

My guess is that the o-200 is probably the second best (and cheapest) engine 
for the KR.   

My vote for best would 100hp Rotax 912 for general general use and turbo 914 
for high long cross country. 

On the “alternative” front, in my STOL flying, one of my buddies flies a Yamaha 
RX1 powered (140hp at 10,000rpm) Highlander.  He (and now a lot of others have) 
had great experience with with the engine.  Who knows, maybe it will be a 
viable alternative to the Rotax.   There was just a Kitfox RX1 FWF package 
advertised locally on craigslist for $5200 - so pretty cheap.

There’s something about the KR that just screams for the simplicity and grass 
roots of the VW.  It seems like it should also be the cheapest, but after 
rebuilding it a few times costs add up.

Unfortunately we now have 3 VWs and none of them were all that simple. Indeed 
all of them are very interesting, but all probably not what I’d like my son to 
fly behind.  The project came with a Hapi Magnum engine (94mm bore x 69mm stoke 
and individual scat heads). Worries about cooling led me to sell the scat heads 
(to a fellow making 1/2 VWs) and purchase a home brew Great Plains.   That 
engine was extremely interesting, having been built up by a retired Ford engine 
engineer with LN Engineering (Nickies) Aluminum cylinders, fuel injection, 
turbo charger, electronic ignition and injection control, etc. etc.    Finally 
- to cap the rare and way too interesting VW engine saga, a Great Plains “Top 
Bug” 2600 Type 4 (103x78, also fuel injected and electric ignition, ForceOne 
crank/hub, alternator)  Yikes!  

Yeah, my son is hooked on the VW’s.   But I keep seeing things like the 
experiences of folks trying to push overloaded VW vans with the those ol 
engines and imagine we’d get similar reliability (or lack of it - have you ever 
seen this youtube series  - https://youtu.be/7zfg-XJ99hg 
<https://youtu.be/7zfg-XJ99hg> ?). 

I've survived two engine outs (one a rotax 503 and the other a o-200 cont), and 
really would prefer not to see a third. Ironically, the engine I recommend is 
either a Rotax or a Continental o-200. However it is clear that the mean time 
between failures is far higher for the VW. 

Anyways, it is also clear that the KR can make great use of extra horsepower.   
With more HP, the KR goes faster.   Obvious?  Not really. Adding hp to a lot of 
airplanes mostly increases climb rate but has minimal effect on cruise speed.   
The reason for that weird phenomenon has a bit to do with the exponential 
increase of drag with speed, and a good bit to do with a more complex aspect of 
aerodynamics similar the the hull speed limitation of ships.  

With the realistic ~60hp a VW will pump out, they seem to see ~130mph.    With 
100hp from an o-200 a lot of folks are seeing something closer to 160mph.

So your choice for reliably getting 100hp? Either a 165lb Rotax 912 that burns 
4.5gph or a 225lb Continental o-200 burning 5.5gph.  I think you could lighten 
the o-200 quite a bit (sub 200lbs) with a light weight starter, replacing the 
mags with EI, and using a Ellison carb, but you’ll never get it close to the 
165lbs of the Rotax.

All that said, my son intends to stick to the VW.  He’s in a rush to get it 
finished and flying since he’s off to college next fall.  Me, well I’m looking 
for a 912 ;-)

Cheers,
Owen
https://sites.google.com/view/melbycavalier/home 
<https://sites.google.com/view/melbycavalier/home>
https://youtu.be/uHGx25FIYDg <https://youtu.be/uHGx25FIYDg> - Oshkosh
https://youtu.be/4aAJnWaqhUg <https://youtu.be/4aAJnWaqhUg> - Kitfox
https://youtu.be/njuvkIEl_VQ <https://youtu.be/njuvkIEl_VQ>




  
> On Dec 31, 2019, at 9:00 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:19:34 +0000
> From: G R Pickett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: KR> Engine Selection
> Message-ID:
>       
> <dm6pr07mb4923ea6515c317fde0843f69ae...@dm6pr07mb4923.namprd07.prod.outlook.com
>  
> <mailto:dm6pr07mb4923ea6515c317fde0843f69ae...@dm6pr07mb4923.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>>
>       
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Just a reminder that today's VW engines was originally designed for flight 
> (target drones), and adapted to mass production for cars.  There was even a 
> German-certified Limbach, that produced about 6000 of them.  Their 
> performance in Beetles is legendary, but everyone who had one knows that they 
> do require different maintenance than American liquid cooled auto engines.  
> Properly assembling them with modern modifications really seems to extend 
> their TBO, but VeeDubs do  need more attention to the valves than 
> Continentals.  Additionally, VW valves are less expensive to repair.
> The KRs were built around the VW engine, and LOTS of builders have great 
> success with them.  If today's builders want to try newer, more powerful 
> engines in our KRs, we can do so - giving a little extra meaning to the 
> category of "Experimental."  Names like Jabiru and Rotax sound like viable 
> options. Neither is That much cheaper than a Lycoming, and sometimes parts 
> are more difficult to find at reasonable prices.
> Myself, I've often thought that liquid cooling might be a good alternative 
> for aircraft use, especially in the flight regimes use by most KR pilots.  
> Still, there haven't been so many liquid-cooled KRs flying for 10+ years that 
> I can think of.  
> Griff

_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to [email protected]

Reply via email to