Larry Flesner wrote: > The 2S with larger tail surfaces might handle that area > without a problem but that is not something I'm confirming here.
Richard Mole did an analysis back in 1998, where he determined that the KR2S had a slightly better CG range than the KR2.....you get another 0.4" aft. He also concurred that the aft two inches of the RR given CG range was an "avoid if you value your life" zone. So to clarify, the range that KR builders have used as gospel is 8"-14" aft of the leading edge of the center wing. The KR2S expands the aft end of the range slightly....
Mark Langford m...@n56ml.com http://www.n56ml.com Huntsville, AL _______________________________________________ Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/. Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html. see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change options. To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
