Mark Langford Mechanical Engineer....RETIRED! [email protected] http://www.n56ml.com Huntsville, AL ________________________________ -Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html -Change list delivery options at https://list.krnet.org/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ Affinity List Info Board -Search recent KRnet Archives at https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/-Search John Bouyea's decades of archive at https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
There's no need to torque the crap out of any of the wing attach
fittings through the spars, or even WAF to WAF, for that matter. They
are simply "pin joints" in engineering terms, meant to keep things from
moving around. Friction is not even considered when analyzing the
stress on these things, even in the case of the WAF to WAF connections.
NASA doesn't even consider friction in stress analysis of critical
structures, at least that's been my experience. If you start crushing
wood, you're over tightening. Don't bother with torque charts....that
is not the proper "case" for these bolts, given that they can easily
crush the spruce.
- KR>Spar bolts/nuts Brett Lombardi
- KR>Re: Spar bolts/nuts Chris Kinnaman
- KR>Re: Spar bolts/nuts jean paul GLOTIN
- KR>Re: Spar bolts/nuts Flesner
- KR>Re: Spar bolts/nuts Mark Langford
- KR>Re: Spar bolts/nuts Flesner
- KR>Re: Spar bolts/nuts Mark Wegmet
- KR>Re: Spar bolts/nuts Flesner
- KR>Re: Spar bolts/nuts Mark Wegmet

