Thanks to all the KR folk for giving me so many good options.

On Tue, May 31, 2022, 10:52 AM svd via KRnet <[email protected]> wrote:

> where in nor cal?
>
> eaa 1541 (lincoln) has a dynamic balancer and does it for a contribution
> ofsomething like$100
>
>
> On May 31, 2022, at 12:06 AM, Gary Sack via KRnet <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Help! Yes, my prop is dynamically unbalanced and blindly sanding at
> guessed at locations has helped somewhat. I now know I need a $1500
> Dynavibe balancer, which is a quarter what I paid for N81JM. Can these be
> rented? Does anyone in Northern California have one? Any suggestions?
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022, 5:40 PM MS <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'll second the importance of keeping the prop dynamically balanced.
>>
>> A Dynavibe balancer, the one they call the "Classic" (rather than the
>> higher priced model the name of I've forgotten, other than they want 4K for
>> it) should be conidered an essential hangar tool.  Mark has one and I've
>> got both the classic and the X3 or whatever they call it.  I've got both of
>> them - the company just sent me the fancy one when it first came out.  When
>> I asked "why" they just said they'd appreciate an evaluation.  In view of
>> such generosity I didn't really give them an evaluation of the X3 since, to
>> me, it's a complete waste of money.  It will accept two cables providing
>> info from two sensors, one in front and the other at the rear of the engine
>> thus helping to diagnose some internal problem.  You still have to take the
>> engine apart to see what the issue is, so what good is a vibration
>> diagnosis?  At any rate, the features of the X3 may be of use to full-time
>> engine professionals.  For keeping a smooth prop that does just as good a
>> job as its expensive brother, the $1500 Classic model is excellent.  I
>> found the X3 unusable actually.  Supposedly it tells you exactly how much
>> weight to use when balancing, but this is something you get a "feel" for
>> after using the cheap one for any period of time.  You still have to run
>> the engine up one more time to check the accuracy of the weight placement,
>> whichever one you're using, so the X3 turned out to just be a PITA.  I
>> should have sold it long ago.  It's just another thing I've let pile up
>> that needs doing.
>>
>> Anyway, a dynamically balanced prop is a joy to operate.  You'll get more
>> RPM's for the same throttle/mixture setting.  Instruments and control
>> attachments will be less stressed, as will the pilot and passengers and the
>> engine bearings.   There's nothing like doing your balancing yourself.
>> Take it to a shop and you can bet they won't do as fine a balance as you
>> will.  I've done a few balance jobs that had been recently balanced by a
>> "shop" and in some (most) cases their margins were ridiculous compared to
>> how perfectly you can do it using your own balance job.  Since the intro of
>> the Dynavibe back in 2006 or 7, one or two other companies have come out
>> with low cost balancers so they're not hard to find.  I can't imagine
>> they'll be any better than the Dynavibe however.  I've done dozens and
>> dozens of balance jobs since I got mine in 2007 and I've never needed any
>> maintenance with the sensors or the hand-held computer.    Mount it on a
>> pedestal shop fan for practice and to learn how it works and save a bunch
>> of avgas.
>>
>> The "C" model Comanche and the Twin Comanches after a certain year had
>> extensions and didn't have problems . . . but then they had Lycomings, not
>> Revmasters.   The cranks may be just as good on both, for all I know.  They
>> have to be forged of course.  Cast cranks (and flywheels, etc.) were the
>> death of HAPI.
>>
>> Mike
>> KSEE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> KRnet mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>>
> --
> KRnet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>
>
> --
> KRnet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
>
-- 
KRnet mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet

Reply via email to