Josh Hurst wrote: > On 11/13/06, Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer at sun.com> wrote: > > >>>>> "Alan" == Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at sun.com> writes: > > > > Roland> the problem is that the OS/Net rules require a "putback with no > > Roland> known bugs in the code" > > > > Alan> Really? I've never done an ON putback, but I thought it was "no > > Alan> known significant bugs" (on our priority scale, no Priority 1, 2, > > Alan> or 3 bugs, but Priority 4 & 5 are allowed > > > > Correct--no known P1-P3 bugs. > How to you rate the getconf bug? P1?
I would rate it somewhere between P2 and P3, however I guess that the standards people at Sun will rate it somwwhere at P-"if you don't fix this before the initial putback we will skin you alive" :-) It just doesn't feel good because I hoped to do a putback in the B51 timeframe - but it seems this option is now gone thanks to the CTF problem... ;-( ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
