Milan Jurik wrote: > Roland Mainz p????e v ??t 02. 07. 2009 v 20:22 +0200: [snip] > > 2. The current set of binaries passes the following tests: > > - Building SFWNV (SPARC+x86), both normal and with /sbin/sh==ksh93 > > (excluding the issue described in > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6817601 > > (which I manually worked-around)) > > - Booting SXB110 with ksh93 updated but not /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated > > to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 two times for each platform > > - Booting SXB110 with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated > > to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 two times for each platform > > - bldenv compiling OS/Net with ksh93 updated but not > > /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 two two for > > each platform > > - bldenv compiling OS/Net with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh > > updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 two times for each platform > > - "nightly" compiling OS/Net with ksh93 updated but not > > /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 three times > > for SPARC and two times for x86 > > - "nightly" compiling OS/Net with ksh93 updated _and_ > > /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 three times > > for each platform > > - compiling FOX with ksh93 updated but not /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated > > to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 > > - compiling FOX with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated to > > ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 > > - compiling+using KDE with ksh93 updated but not /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh > > updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 > > - compiling+using KDE with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh > > updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 > > - bldenv SFWNV with ksh93 updated but not /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated > > to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 two times for each platform > > - bldenv SFWNV with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated to > > ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 > > - "nightly" SFWNV with ksh93 updated but not /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh > > updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 > > - "nightly" SFWNV with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated > > to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 > > > > * Missing tests: > > - SXCE update using ksh93-integration update tarballs and _then_ use > > LiveUpgrade to update to SXCE_next (Milan has to do this since I have no > > disk space) > > - dtrace test suite (tried to contact the dtrace people but they didn't > > reply yet). Can't do it myself since it repeatedly blows-up VMware > > similar to > > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6609054 > > - UNIX98 and UNIX03 std tests for the commands we replace (excluding > > ksh93 itself). Needs to be done by Milan since the tests are for the > > paying audience only... ;-( > > - DIY testing is still pending > > - <milan: What did I forgot ?> > > Send me all nightly logs from your builds ;-)
Erm... I only have the emails, not the full logs anymore (I've removed the trees (not enougth disk space) and therefore the matching log/ directories... sorry) ... but I cam regenerate the stuff (only needs a could of days - all builds need to be done serially+manually to handle the disk space restructions here) > I will do some additional nightlies of ON on my build machines. LU and > VSC testing also. DIY testing is done by Thomas or should I do them? I've poked Thomas already for the "DIY" ([1]) ... [1]=For those who don't know what this means: "DIY" is "Do It Yourself", some Sun-internal test system which grabs a BFU tarball, installs it and then runs some tests on the resulting machine... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;)
