Hi, Sanity tests for DIY run 'snv_117-k93t0702' passed fine. I've attached install script and install logs for sparcs.
I've now submitted the full batch of tests under build name 'snv_117-k93r0702'. Regards, Thomas On 07/03/09 13:11, thomas palud - Sun Microsystems - Dublin Ireland wrote: > Hi, > > I've submitted a couple of sanity tests in DIY under the name > 'snv_117-k93t0702' > > When completed and verified I will submit the full batch of tests. > > Note that DIY is very busy at the moment with over 1000 tests waiting > to run ... it may take a while before it gets to run. > > Cheers, > > Thomas > > On 07/02/09 21:09, Roland Mainz wrote: >> Milan Jurik wrote: >> >>> Roland Mainz p????e v ??t 02. 07. 2009 v 20:22 +0200: >>> >> [snip] >> >>>> 2. The current set of binaries passes the following tests: >>>> - Building SFWNV (SPARC+x86), both normal and with /sbin/sh==ksh93 >>>> (excluding the issue described in >>>> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6817601 >>>> (which I manually worked-around)) >>>> - Booting SXB110 with ksh93 updated but not /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated >>>> to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 two times for each platform >>>> - Booting SXB110 with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated >>>> to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 two times for each platform >>>> - bldenv compiling OS/Net with ksh93 updated but not >>>> /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 two two for >>>> each platform >>>> - bldenv compiling OS/Net with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh >>>> updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 two times for each platform >>>> - "nightly" compiling OS/Net with ksh93 updated but not >>>> /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 three times >>>> for SPARC and two times for x86 >>>> - "nightly" compiling OS/Net with ksh93 updated _and_ >>>> /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 three times >>>> for each platform >>>> - compiling FOX with ksh93 updated but not /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated >>>> to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 >>>> - compiling FOX with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated to >>>> ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 >>>> - compiling+using KDE with ksh93 updated but not /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh >>>> updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 >>>> - compiling+using KDE with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh >>>> updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 >>>> - bldenv SFWNV with ksh93 updated but not /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated >>>> to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 two times for each platform >>>> - bldenv SFWNV with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated to >>>> ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 >>>> - "nightly" SFWNV with ksh93 updated but not /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh >>>> updated to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 >>>> - "nightly" SFWNV with ksh93 updated _and_ /sbin/sh+/usr/bin/sh updated >>>> to ksh93: Ok on SPARC and x86 >>>> >>>> * Missing tests: >>>> - SXCE update using ksh93-integration update tarballs and _then_ use >>>> LiveUpgrade to update to SXCE_next (Milan has to do this since I have no >>>> disk space) >>>> - dtrace test suite (tried to contact the dtrace people but they didn't >>>> reply yet). Can't do it myself since it repeatedly blows-up VMware >>>> similar to >>>> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6609054 >>>> - UNIX98 and UNIX03 std tests for the commands we replace (excluding >>>> ksh93 itself). Needs to be done by Milan since the tests are for the >>>> paying audience only... ;-( >>>> - DIY testing is still pending >>>> - <milan: What did I forgot ?> >>>> >>> Send me all nightly logs from your builds ;-) >>> >> >> Erm... I only have the emails, not the full logs anymore (I've removed >> the trees (not enougth disk space) and therefore the matching log/ >> directories... sorry) ... but I cam regenerate the stuff (only needs a >> could of days - all builds need to be done serially+manually to handle >> the disk space restructions here) >> >> >>> I will do some additional nightlies of ON on my build machines. LU and >>> VSC testing also. DIY testing is done by Thomas or should I do them? >>> >> >> I've poked Thomas already for the "DIY" ([1]) ... >> >> [1]=For those who don't know what this means: "DIY" is "Do It Yourself", >> some Sun-internal test system which grabs a BFU tarball, installs it and >> then runs some tests on the resulting machine... >> >> ---- >> >> Bye, >> Roland >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss/attachments/20090706/a45a2568/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ksh93_install.log URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss/attachments/20090706/a45a2568/attachment.ksh> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: install.ksh URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss/attachments/20090706/a45a2568/attachment-0001.ksh>
