The patch looks good.

Irek

On 7/20/09, Roland Mainz <roland.mainz at nrubsig.org> wrote:
> "I. Szczesniak" wrote:
>  > On 7/20/09, Roland Mainz <roland.mainz at nrubsig.org> wrote:
>
> > >  I need a quick codereview for CR #6862121 ("shbinexec kernel module
>  > >  defunct").
>  > >  The problem is that the current version in OS/Net is based on an older,
>  > >  defunct prototype which was accidently mis-merged by me into the
>  > >  ksh93-integration update1 putback codebase, causing this bug.
>  > >
>  > >  The patch restores the intended version and fixes a small additional bug
>  > >  which happens if compiled shell scripts start with a '-' character (e.g.
>  > >  the only new line of code is |idata.intp_arg = "--";|).
>  > >
>  > >  Webrev for review is available at
>  > >  
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr_6862121_shbinexec_kernel_module_defunct_20090720_001/
>  > >
>  > >  References for reviewers:
>  > >  - javaexec kernel module source:
>  > >  
> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/exec/java/java.c
>  > >  - interpreter kernel module source:
>  > >  
> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/exec/intp/intp.c
>  >
>
> > The patch looks OK. You may want to check whether function shbinexec()
>  > can be made 'static'.
>
>
> Fixed.
>  Additionally I fixed the unneccesary |memset()| (no longer needed since
>  we set all members of |idata| manually now) per Jennifer's comments.
>
>  New webrev is available as
>  
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gisburn/cr_6862121_shbinexec_kernel_module_defunct_20090720_002/
>
>
>  ----
>
>  Bye,
>  Roland
>
>  --
>   __ .  . __
>   (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
>   \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
>   /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 3992797
>   (;O/ \/ \O;)
>  _______________________________________________
>  ksh93-integration-discuss mailing list
>  ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org
>  http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ksh93-integration-discuss
>

Reply via email to