Milan Jurik wrote: > V st, 18. 02. 2009 v 21:44, Alan Coopersmith p????e: > > Roland Mainz wrote: > > > IMO it would be nice to have a three-month "moratorim" to give us time > > > to kill all bugs. Please. > > > > We're shipping products from the Nevada tree every six months now > > (in the case of OpenSolaris), sometimes even more frequently (when > > you view other Nevada derivatives like xVM server & Fishworks), so > > while it may be nice, it's not really going to happen. nv_111 is > > currently planned to be the OpenSolaris 2009.06 release build, and > > that's only about 4 weeks away from closing now. > > But that is Sun product/problem, not Opensolaris project. We (as Sun) > can respin with selected different binaries if really needed. > > I am in Sun not so long but I remember worse regressions done (and not > only in SXCE), effecting customers for longer time. > > Yes, 3 months moratorium is a bit long. [snip]
Erm... the point of the "moratorium" was to give the "alias.(c|sh)"-architecture time and not a moratorium to defer/delay any bugfixes. We're trying to handle any possible regressions and bugs ASAP. ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;)
