John Plocher wrote: > Keith M Wesolowski wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:03:19AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: >>> Grumpf... >> Am I correct in thinking that your concerns around removing these >> files are entirely a result of a belief that the structure of the code >> should be optimised for bulk upgrades from an external source base? > > > It sounds like there is/will/reallyshouldbe two different blobs of > code in the source tree: > > The baseline ATT sources, exactly as delivered by ATT > > and > > A derived set of OpenSolaris source files
That sounds exactly like the SFW model and completely not like the ON model. Given this project is targeting ON (for what ever reason - personally I think it might have been more appropriate for SFW but I don't know enough of the details so I trust the project teams choice of using ON) that is NOT appropriate. -- Darren J Moffat
