On 3/8/07, John Plocher <John.Plocher at sun.com> wrote: > Richard Lowe wrote: > > No > > So, since it seems likely that the ksh93 project will need/desire > to keep this stuff around, where is it expected to live? As I read > Roland's comments (and, I admit I probably am confused), it seems like > he is desperately trying to keep the original ATT code (makefiles...) > in the source tree.
Let's try to approach this problem from a different perspective: Roland posted an annotated list of files based on the list of unreferenced files - which files in that list should be - in your opinion - removed from his ON prototype? Irek