> From: Don Cragun <don.cragun at sun.com> ... > C. If (or when) a case comes forward to replace one or more of > /sbin/sh, /usr/bin/sh, /usr/bin/ksh, and /usr/xpg4/bin/sh with > ksh93 we will need to discuss this again as a compatibility > issue. That discussion should not sidetrack this case. Note > that /sbin/sh and /usr/bin/sh do not currently provide any > command line editing options.
I guess I have to disagree here. All along the project team has expressed a desire for ksh93 to become the one true shell. I believe it is irresponsible to plant landmines along the project team's roadmap. Its seems very interesting to me that the project team seems to be the one planting the mines. 8^) - jek3
