On 7/27/06, Casper.Dik at sun.com <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote:
>
> >I suggest to make /bin/ksh ksh93 from the beginning that you don't
> >have to deal with any backwards compatibility fuzz later
>
> If you want PowerPC Solaris and SPARC/x86 Solaris be that different,
> then yes; if you want scripts to be compatible I suggest not.

Why not? ksh93 is mostly backwards compatible to Solaris ksh

PS: Somehow I have the feeling that Sun doesn't want to see the
project succeed in replacing ksh88 with ksh93, a feeling which is
based on the open hostilities from Sun personnel and the permanent
delays :(
-- 
     //   Martin Schaffstall
    //    EMail: martin.schaffstall at googlemail.com
\\ //
 \X/

Reply via email to