cc:  james.d.carlson at sun.com
Subject: Re: Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: Patch to introduce "oksh" to  
OS/Net
--------

Could someone explain the problem with libc/wordexp() that requires
the old ksh?

Why not just modify libc/wordexp() so that is uses the new ksh?
The ast version of worexp() uses ksh93.  Why can't libc/wordexp()
use the same method?

David Korn
dgk at research.att.com

Reply via email to