>cc: james.d.carlson at sun.com >Subject: Re: Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: Patch to introduce "oksh" to >OS/Net >-------- > >Could someone explain the problem with libc/wordexp() that requires >the old ksh? > >Why not just modify libc/wordexp() so that is uses the new ksh? >The ast version of worexp() uses ksh93. Why can't libc/wordexp() >use the same method?
It needs to be modified not to run a shell at all. Why does it need to run a shell? Casper
