On Friday 07 November 2008 01:14:35 Glen wrote: > Is there any direction / ideas for what direction the simulator should > go? I have my own ideas, especially now since I've probed the code a > little bit, but what's really better for the project? Some time ago, it was mentioned on the list, that the actual code won't scale. So it's really hard to add new components to the simulator. We need a way to define components more easy. XML would be something to mention here. I don't see the problem to do something like that with the visualisation part, but for the simulator I don't see a good way to do it. There is a wiki page for features: http://ktechlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=DEVEL:Feature_Request
I mentioned to create the simulation logic in the XML files via ECMA script, since this could be interpreted by Qt. I haven't done any speed tests till now.. shame on me. > What would people like to see it do beyond what it does now? May be, you could have a look at the feature requests and see if your ideas fit in there. I suggest to find something you want to work on and then we should talk about it (may be irc or IM, or something similar) to see, how it should be implemented. May be something needs to be ported before you start. Do you have kdelibs4 installed? IMHO it won't be a good idea to develop hot new features for the KDE3 version. bye then julian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
