On Tuesday 17 November 2009 14:13:00 Zoltan Padrah wrote: > The topic in the subject should be also discussed. I've never worked yet > with either one, but SVN has some shortcomings -- for example is hard to > track code changes. > > Compatibility with KDE could be a bonus. kde still uses svn. Qt uses git, first applications (amarok as one of the more-known projects) converted their repositories to git and there are discussions to move whole kde to git. > Julian worked with git on kde4 port. yes, that's why I vote for git ;) since it's really nice to work with this tool in a group. I'll write about one suggestion on how to organise our source with git, later.
Another comment is: sf.net should allow us to run both systems for a while, right? So we could just switch it on, for a while and have a try. I'm willing (and already doing so) to keep the git repo in sync with the svn. bye then julian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
