On Wednesday 18 November 2009 20:45:54 P Zoltan wrote: > Good, so this question is cleared. > Should I enable the git now? I'm in. The sf.net wiki says, default repo-name will be like the project's unix groupname. I guess, ktechlab that is. We should use this one as upstream, since every user might at first try the standard configuration.
As I told you, I already synced my repository against SVN. I think this is ready to go upstream as it is. (Since I never changed a thing to any of these branches). Have a look here: https://krtek.asta.uni-luebeck.de/repos/KTechLab/ There you can see 3 branches. Master is the branch representing SVN trunk and ktechlab-0.3.7 obviously represents SVN branches/ktechlab-0.3.7. Since there is no real 0.3.6 branch in SVN, I didn't copy more. There are 2 special branches, that have not been in use for 2 years and the other one 20month, I know that at least one of them isn't needed any longer ;) I also tagged the 0.3.6 release commit, but haven't done so for 0.3.7. I think, the kde4-playground branch should not be upstream (I commited some crap for testing purposes). I'll come up with a better one, based on master, to provide a starting point for porting. bye then julian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
