> In this case, you still get rekonq if there's no network during install. >
Yep, the same way you get a Kubuntu without multimedia codecs without a network. > I don't see any significant advantage for doing it during the install versus > making it easy to do post-install. Why do you think it's better? > I'm open to suggestions on how to make it super easy for users to install another browser post-install. Especially since users migrating from Windows/OS X have no concept of 'packages' and even installing something like firefox can be daunting task. Personally, I'd expect them to go to firefox.com and download the sources instead of downloading the binary packages since that's what they're accustomed to. > Also, if we start having application selection during install, what else ends > up there? It's a slippery slope. True. As always there are tradeoffs to be made here. But if you have a look around, people seem to be comfortable with dragon as their video player as compared to rekonq as their default browser ( just an example ). > > Scott K > > -- > kubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
