On Saturday, February 22, 2014 18:03:52 Phil Wyett wrote: > On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 11:48:13 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:08:35 Rohan Garg wrote: > > > > I think you are misreading that. It specifically talks about users > > > > > > potentially > > > > > > > needing to upgrade only every 4 years. > > > > > > Unless my eyes are deceiving me, the last line specifically talks about > > > upgrading twice every 4 years, which equates to a support lifetime of 2 > > > years? > > > > OK. In any case, I still have 5 year LTS. In addition to the reasons I > > mentioned previously, I don't want to accept Kubuntu being second class > > citizen in the Ubuntu project in any way I don't have to. > > > > I think 5 years is working out for 12.04 (so far) and I don't think we > > should change. > > > > Scott K > > Hi all, > > I would also like to see the LTS maintain the 5 years. Would the 14.04 LTS > also follow the same ethos as 12.04 and stick with the original stack > (kernel, xorg ...) and not update it as Ubuntu does at point release?
I think it needs to be updated on the install media to install on newer hardware, but existing installs aren't affected. Scott K -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
