On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > On Saturday, February 22, 2014 18:03:52 Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 11:48:13 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > On Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:08:35 Rohan Garg wrote: >> > > > I think you are misreading that. It specifically talks about users >> > > >> > > potentially >> > > >> > > > needing to upgrade only every 4 years. >> > > >> > > Unless my eyes are deceiving me, the last line specifically talks about >> > > upgrading twice every 4 years, which equates to a support lifetime of 2 >> > > years? >> > >> > OK. In any case, I still have 5 year LTS. In addition to the reasons I >> > mentioned previously, I don't want to accept Kubuntu being second class >> > citizen in the Ubuntu project in any way I don't have to. >> > >> > I think 5 years is working out for 12.04 (so far) and I don't think we >> > should change. >> > >> > Scott K
Alright, after discussing this on IRC, a 5 year LTS should be doable. However, IMHO we MUST transparently convey what a LTS means for Kubuntu. Specifically, we should have a page outlining what support means for Kubuntu specifically ( software is supported only when KDE upstream supports it, there is absolutely NO support for software that KDE deems unsupported ). Cheers Rohan Garg -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
