On 6 Jun 2014 08:36, "Scott Kitterman" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thursday, June 05, 2014 16:35:30 Philip Muskovac wrote: > ... > > Now to the coucil: I'm not quite sure how to intepret [1]. > > Taking it literally, quorum is 3x +1 no matter what the other 3 people vote > > (if at all). Which would mean though that 3x +1 and 3x -1 are a passing > > vote of 0. Our old council voting rules [2] state that quorum is a majority > > vote with the chair having a casting vote, but we haven't had a chair for > > years (unless you consider jr to be the permanent chair)
This is what the ircc does and has done for a while. Simple majority with a dead lock breaker if needed. How is it done on other councils? > > Another quorum definition would be to require +3, with nobody voting -1 > > (which is what I personally favor, but that might be rather impractical for > > decision making) Or we require a general majority vote of people present > > (i.e. 3 people have to vote for >= +3, for 6 people present it's >= +4, and > > for less than 3 people vote continues per mail unless at least +3 is > > reached) I believe that's closest to the last CC discussion about this [3] > > > > What may I understand as the correct interpretation here? > ... > > How does this compare to what's in the documentation for kubuntu-dev to > approave a new member? I remember agreeing with that and think it's likely > what we meant for the council as well, but maybe better written. > > Scott K > > -- > kubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel Jussi
-- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
