On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 02:55:25PM +0200, Philip Muskovac wrote: > I think the reason the other councils have 7 people is mostly for attendance > reasons so I'm not sure whether we really need it. > > We could stay close to the dev ruling and say: > A vote needs to have at least +3 with at least 4 people having voted, be it > in > meeting or ML. > That would make the passing conditions: > +6 > +5 = +5 [+0] > +4 = +5 -1 [+0], +4 [+2x0] > +3 = +4 -1 [+0], +3 +0 [+2x0] > > This would also make ties impossible as at most one person may be against it. > (which would mean that +3 -2 also doesn't pass, it also pretty much reduces > the voting to a 5 people council with the 6th person being a voting speed up) > Too complicated or do the others think that we can usually agree on something > to pass it?
When I started the Kubuntu Council I picked 6 as being a high number compared to, I think, 4 on technical board and community council. High so that it didn't matter if someone dropped out. I've always considered a vote to be quorum with 3 people, requiring more just means there is more chance for too many people to drop off the internet and a vote not to be possible. So my vote is for 3 people as quorum. Meta votes are tricky :) Jonathan -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
