IMO we don't need visual at all. All we need to show, we can pass as links.
I agree with Mumble. Then we could have a 1 or 2 hour meeting. Otherwise, in text only, IMO the meeting will take at least 4 hours, and probably split it again. My issue with Text only meetings, is that we waste a lot of time waiting for people to answer, and we suspect they are typing, when they are actually not. Also it takes a loot of time to type to get a message through. The Words per minute is lower on Text only than voice meetings. That's what makes me feel the text only meeting is less productive. *Ovidiu - Florin BOGDAN* GeekAliens.com <http://ovidiu.geekaliens.com> Kubuntu România <http://kubuntu.org> <http://www.google.com/profiles/ovidiu.b13> 2016-11-06 1:09 GMT+02:00 Valorie Zimmerman <[email protected]>: > On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Clay Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Saturday, November 5, 2016 7:27:32 PM EDT Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN wrote: > >> We've somewhat established a almost draft of a Vision. > >> > >> We still need to have the second meeting, hopefully not in just IRC. > >> > > Not everyone wants or is able to do things outside of irc > > -- > > Clay Weber > > IRC is my top choice, and I understand why it makes Ovidiu-Florin so > impatient, too. On the other hand, some changes either on our side, or > in BBB make the sound so garbled for me that I'm unable to understand > anything spoken. > > I'm wondering if we can try Mumble again, if voice is still important? > For this meeting, I think the visual element is not of use. > > Valorie > > -- > kubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel >
-- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
