Liming,
Yes, both packages came from the same packages.
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 62 Mar 27 16:12
/depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-1.2.1.1-6.el5.i386.rpm ->
../../../kits/rhel/5/x86_64/Server/dapl-1.2.1.1-6.el5.i386.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 79 Mar 27 16:13
/depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-1.2.4-0.285.ofed20080207.x86_64.rpm ->
../../../kits/ofed/1.3/noarch/dapl-1.2.4-0.285.ofed20080207.x86_64.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 79 Mar 27 16:13
/depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-2.0.6-0.286.ofed20080207.x86_64.rpm ->
../../../kits/ofed/1.3/noarch/dapl-2.0.6-0.286.ofed20080207.x86_64.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 68 Mar 27 16:12
/depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-devel-1.2.1.1-6.el5.i386.rpm ->
../../../kits/rhel/5/x86_64/Server/dapl-devel-1.2.1.1-6.el5.i386.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 85 Mar 27 16:13
/depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-devel-1.2.4-0.285.ofed20080207.x86_64.rpm
->
../../../kits/ofed/1.3/noarch/dapl-devel-1.2.4-0.285.ofed20080207.x86_64
.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 85 Mar 27 16:13
/depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-devel-2.0.6-0.286.ofed20080207.x86_64.rpm
->
../../../kits/ofed/1.3/noarch/dapl-devel-2.0.6-0.286.ofed20080207.x86_64
.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 92 Mar 27 16:13
/depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-devel-static-1.2.4-0.285.ofed20080207.x86_
64.rpm ->
../../../kits/ofed/1.3/noarch/dapl-devel-static-1.2.4-0.285.ofed20080207
.x86_64.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 92 Mar 27 16:13
/depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-devel-static-2.0.6-0.286.ofed20080207.x86_
64.rpm ->
../../../kits/ofed/1.3/noarch/dapl-devel-static-2.0.6-0.286.ofed20080207
.x86_64.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 85 Mar 27 16:13
/depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-utils-1.2.4-0.285.ofed20080207.x86_64.rpm
->
../../../kits/ofed/1.3/noarch/dapl-utils-1.2.4-0.285.ofed20080207.x86_64
.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 85 Mar 27 16:13
/depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-utils-2.0.6-0.286.ofed20080207.x86_64.rpm
->
../../../kits/ofed/1.3/noarch/dapl-utils-2.0.6-0.286.ofed20080207.x86_64
.rpm
Regards,
Agustin
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tsai Li Ming
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 2:40 PM
To: Users of Kusu
Subject: Re: [Kusu-users] [RPM LIST]
Agustin,
Both packages are from the same kit?
Could you do a ls -l on /depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-*.rpm?
Thanks,
Liming
March, Agustin M wrote:
> Hi Liming,
> This is the ouput
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qp
> /depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-2.0.6-0.286.ofed20080207.x86_64.rpm
> --qf="%{NAME} %{EPOCH} %{VERSION} %{RELEASE}\n"
> dapl (none) 2.0.6 0.286.ofed20080207
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qp
> /depot/repos/1000/Server/dapl-1.2.4-0.285.ofed20080207.x86_64.rpm
> --qf="%{NAME} %{EPOCH} %{VERSION} %{RELEASE}\n"
> dapl (none) 1.2.4 0.285.ofed20080207
>
>
> Regards,
> Agustin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Tsai Li Ming
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:39 PM
> To: Users of Kusu
> Subject: Re: [Kusu-users] [RPM LIST]
>
> Hi Agustin,
>
> It could be a bug in repoman. To help me isolate this, can you run the
> following on both packages:
>
> rpm -qp <pkg> --qf="%{NAME} %{EPOCH} %{VERSION} %{RELEASE}\n"
>
> -Liming
>
>
> March, Agustin M wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Yes, there two packages with different version of the same
>> architecture. Is it possible to select on of them? So, How Could I
>> select, the ngedit does not allow it?
>> One example of this is the ofed package 1.3, the following packages
> are
>> in the repo
>>
>> dapl-1.2.4-0.285.x86_64.rpm
>> dapl-2.0.6-0.286.x86_64.rpm
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Agustin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Tsai Li Ming
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:50 PM
>> To: Users of Kusu
>> Subject: Re: [Kusu-users] [RPM LIST]
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Are there more than 1 rpm of the same package name in the repo,
Nmame?
>>
>> You can find the packages using:
>> /depot/repos/<repoid> -name "*<pkg name>*"?
>>
>> repoid can be found using "repoman -l".
>>
>> You can use rpm -qa | grep or rpm -qi to identify the packages once
> they
>> are installed.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Liming
>>
>>
>> March, Agustin M wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I am working with external packages from KUSU and some kits
>>> distribution. So, I would to add to compute nodes, so I did the
>>> following but without success.
>>> Because, I could not identify the correct rpm name used by the kusu
> in
>>> the packages tables.
>>>
>>> cp *.rpm /depot/kit/somekitassociatedtoaRepo/
>>> repoman -u -r "Nmame"
>>> insert the rpm name into the database.
>>> Since, there two version of the same name packages, kusu installs
>> both.
>>> Is there any way to identify those package in the kusu?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Agustin March <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Argentina Distributing Computing Solution
>>> +54 351 5265618
>>> Intel Argentina S.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kusu-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mail.osgdc.org/mailman/listinfo/kusu-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kusu-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.osgdc.org/mailman/listinfo/kusu-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kusu-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.osgdc.org/mailman/listinfo/kusu-users
> _______________________________________________
> Kusu-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.osgdc.org/mailman/listinfo/kusu-users
> _______________________________________________
> Kusu-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.osgdc.org/mailman/listinfo/kusu-users
_______________________________________________
Kusu-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.osgdc.org/mailman/listinfo/kusu-users
_______________________________________________
Kusu-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.osgdc.org/mailman/listinfo/kusu-users
