* Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Won't that increase task_struct (16 bytes on 64-bit) unnecessarily?
> >> The function pointers are common to all virtual machines.
> >
> > well, this function pointer could then be reused by other virtual
> > machines as well, couldnt it?
>
> I don't get this. If we add a couple of members to task_struct, it
> can't be reused. The values will be the same across all tasks, but
> the memory will be gone (including tasks which aren't virtual
> machines).
i mean, the function pointer is set by KVM, but it could be set to a
different value by other hypervisors.
but ... no strong feelings either way, your patch is certainly fine.
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ingo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
