Gregory Haskins wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 22:20 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
>
>
>> Apply to current kvm.git? Then we need to define false for
>> irqchip_in_kernel() which makes the patch quit stranger.
>
> I think what Avi is saying is this can be generalized as a separate
> feature independent of in-kernel-PIC. Since Avi and I are both
> advocating a separate capability for in-kernel-HLT, you
> wouldn't need to
> have a stubbed irqchip_in_kernel. Rather, you should have a flag that
> indicates whether userspace enabled the HLT capability or not.
Then Avi need to check in your patch in user level to remove the race
condition, otherwise
the patch does nothing and just some dead code.
Avi:
Can u have a double check to see what you want to do. I am fine
with either of them.
Eddie
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
