Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > >> My next TODOs with it are: >> * Get SMP working >> * Try something for stolen time, as jeremy's last suggestion for anthony's >> patch >> * Measure the time it takes for a hypercall, and subtract this time >> for calculating the expiry time for the timer event. >> >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c b/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c >> index d474cd6..fd758f9 100644 >> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c >> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c >> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ >> #include <linux/crash_dump.h> >> #include <linux/dmi.h> >> #include <linux/pfn.h> >> +#include <linux/kvm_para.h> >> >> #include <video/edid.h> >> >> @@ -579,6 +580,9 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p) >> vmi_init(); >> #endif >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_CLOCK >> + kvmclock_init(); >> +#endif >> >> > > Why is this necessary? Can't you hook one of the existing pvops? >
Something needs to install the pvops in the first place. Instead of adding a kvmclock_init(), it would probably be better to add a single kvm_para_init() (as I did in my previous series) and initialize the pv_ops for the clock there. Regards, Anthony Liguori > J > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
