On 10/15/07, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we want to make the clocksource useful for Windows we need to go > through the apic as that will allow the TPR to mask the interrupt when > Windows isn't ready to receive it. However I don't know whether it is > possible to integrate a paravirt clocksource into Windows.
My politically-correct side told me to say that the solution that works also in Windows is the best one ;-) > For Linux, we might as well go further and provide a completely > paravirtualized irqchip instead of trying to integrate a paravirtualized > clocksource into a fullyvirtualized irqchip. > Yes, definitely. In your opinion, what's the size of the gap between the "we can", and the "we should" here? -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
