[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Liu, Eric E wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Since we already have had debugfs_entries and some other kernel
>>>>> debug mechanism to use, does this kvmtrace make sense? Any
>>>>> comment is welcomed.
>>>> This looks very useful.  While kvm_stat provides good data, this
>>>> is much more in depth. 
>>>> 
>>>> The kernel already contains a method of transferring percpu data to
>>>> userspace; see Documentation/filesystems/relay.txt.  It supports
>>>> mmap() and read().  Please see if it is a good fit.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I would also suggest to use the new kernel standard for
>>> instrumentation: trace_mark(). 
>>> 
>>> This would also allow to reuse the trace points with other tracer
>>> and maybe even obsolete a separate transportation channel, e.g.
>>> when LTTng is once :-/ merged. 
>>> 
>> 
>> Can one have markers automatically recorded?  Or do you need to
>> connect the marker with a logging function?
> 
> Yes, of course you need a probe function. Either your own one, or one
> provided by other tracers.
> 
>> 
>> If the latter, it's too difficult to use.
> 
> I don't think it is. Check linux/samples/markers/probe-example.c. BTW,
> RCU-Trace (not yet mainlined) make use of markers as well, see -rt.
> 
> And in contrast to the suggested implementation, markers have less
> impact on the code if built-in but disabled. So there would be no
> reasons for not shipping kvm production binaries that are prepared to
> be traced.
> 
> But if you prefer the inlined version, I bet you'll have to hide it
> from reviewers at LKML. ;)
> 
> Jan

Thanks for your comments, and I think that using relayfs and
trace_mark() is more reasonable, if it makes sense, I will modify the
patches according to these. 



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to