Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:37:19PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote: >>>> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ static noinline __init void detect_machi >>>> /* Running on a P/390 ? */ >>>> if (cpuinfo->cpu_id.machine == 0x7490) >>>> machine_flags |= 4; >>>> + >>>> + /* Running under KVM ? */ >>>> + if (cpuinfo->cpu_id.version == 0xfe) >>>> + machine_flags |= 64; >>> Shouldn't these have symbolic names? >> You mean symbolics for machine_flags? Or symbolics for cpu ids? > > Either. Hmmh. For cpu id's did'nt make sense probably until now that kvm also uses them. Before, this was the only one place that uses them.
With kvm and 0xfe, this one is sort of temporary one. We intend to rework this code to use "store system information", which would give us way more information about the machine and it's hypervisor topology. Up until my todo list gets to that point, I think we'll have to cope with a temporary number. We'll aim for making that change before 2.6.26 gets released. The machine flags do have symbolic names, defined in include/asm-s390/setup.h. And yea, they should be used here. Will change that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
