On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:33:29PM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote: > Am Freitag, den 21.03.2008, 15:06 +0100 schrieb Heiko Carstens: > > Just introduce something like MACHINE_FLAG_KVM. The rest can be converted > > later. Unless you're bored and feel like fiddling around with assembly code > > :) > I've done that patch this morning already, see below. I agree with HCH > that we should do that, but after the kvm merge. I don't want kvm-s390 > conflict with Martin's patches. This is just a beautification, and can > safely wait a release cycle.
That's nice for a start. But you didn't convert the assembly files to use the new defines. So there is still no connection between setting a bit in asm code and the new defines. That's the reason why I said something about fiddling around with asm code. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
