On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 06:26:29PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:20:35PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > I guess I have to prepare another patchset then?
Apologies for my previous not too polite comment in answer to the above, but I thought this double patchset was over now that you converged in #v12 and obsoleted EMM and after the last private discussions. There's nothing personal here on my side, just a bit of general frustration on this matter. I appreciate all great contribution from you, as last your idea to use sort(), but I can't really see any possible benefit or justification anymore from keeping two patchsets floating around given we already converged on the mmu-notifier-core, and given it's almost certain mmu-notifier-core will go in -mm in time for 2.6.26. Let's put it this way, if I fail to merge mmu-notifier-core into 2.6.26 I'll voluntarily give up my entire patchset and leave maintainership to you so you move 1/N to N/N and remove mm_lock-sem patch (everything else can remain the same as it's all orthogonal so changing the order is a matter of minutes). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
