On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:20:35PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > I guess I have to prepare another patchset then? > > If you want to embarrass yourself three time in a row go ahead ;). I > thought two failed takeovers was enough.
Takeover? I'd be happy if I would not have to deal with this issue. These patches were necessary because you were not listening to feedback plus there is the issue that your patchsets were not easy to review or diff against. I had to merge several patches to get to a useful patch. You have always picked up lots of stuff from my patchsets. Lots of work that could have been avoided by proper patchsets in the first place. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
