Glauber Costa wrote: > This patch introduces QEMUAccel, a placeholder for function pointers > that aims at helping qemu to abstract accelerators such as kqemu and > kvm (actually, the 'accelerator' name was proposed by avi kivity, since > he loves referring to kvm that way).
Just a little thought... Maybe 'VCPU' would be a clearer name? QEMU provides its own VCPU, and KQEMU+QEMU also provide one toegether. While KVM provides essentially one or more whole VCPUs by itself and uses QEMU's drivers only doesn't it? -- Jamie ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
