Jamie Lokier wrote: > Glauber Costa wrote: >> This patch introduces QEMUAccel, a placeholder for function pointers >> that aims at helping qemu to abstract accelerators such as kqemu and >> kvm (actually, the 'accelerator' name was proposed by avi kivity, since >> he loves referring to kvm that way). > > Just a little thought... > > Maybe 'VCPU' would be a clearer name? QEMU provides its own VCPU, and > KQEMU+QEMU also provide one toegether. While KVM provides essentially > one or more whole VCPUs by itself and uses QEMU's drivers only doesn't > it? > > -- Jamie VCPU is rather confusing with the vcpus themselves. KVM, for instance, has its own structures called "vcpu".
If it is preferred, however, we can name the structure VCPUOperations, and change the function names that involves accel_yyy to vcpu_op_yyy() What do you think? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
