On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mohammed Gamal wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> Guillaume Thouvenin's VMentry failure detection patch was reverted
>> before because it broke guest rebooting. Although it turned out it
>> didn't, it was preferred not to re-include it because it was not
>> reliable enough. Although it is working fine with me, I want to know
>> why it wasn't re-included? Did it cause any regressions? Is it
>> preferrable to use an alternative mechanism to detect the VM entry
>> failure and start real-mode emulation? If yes, What do you think it
>> should be?
>>
>>
>
> Anthony Liguori reported problems with Ubuntu IIRC. I'd like to know that
> they are fixed, or what exactly the issue was.
>
Well, Ubuntu and openSuSE live CDs used to crash occasionally after
booting, it didn't happen most of the time though. I've never
experienced this issue after kvm-70 - with the patches the patch
included of course. Did anyone have any issues with the patches
included?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
