Mohammed Gamal wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mohammed Gamal wrote:
Hello,
Guillaume Thouvenin's VMentry failure detection patch was reverted
before because it broke guest rebooting. Although it turned out it
didn't, it was preferred not to re-include it because it was not
reliable enough. Although it is working fine with me, I want to know
why it wasn't re-included? Did it cause any regressions? Is it
preferrable to use an alternative mechanism to detect the VM entry
failure and start real-mode emulation? If yes, What do you think it
should be?
Anthony Liguori reported problems with Ubuntu IIRC. I'd like to know that
they are fixed, or what exactly the issue was.
Well, Ubuntu and openSuSE live CDs used to crash occasionally after
booting, it didn't happen most of the time though. I've never
experienced this issue after kvm-70 - with the patches the patch
included of course. Did anyone have any issues with the patches
included?
I think they're fine. Can you check the vmentry patch now, with
Anthony's testcase?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
