----- "Sheng Yang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Saturday 11 October 2008 16:10:51 Amit Shah wrote:
> > From: Sheng Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Keep a record of current interrupt state before injecting. Don't
> > assert/deassert repeatedly, so that every caller of kvm_set_irq()
> > can be identified as a separate interrupt source for the IOAPIC/PIC
> > to implement logical OR of level triggered interrupts on one IRQ
> line.
> >
> > Notice that userspace devices are treated as one device for each
> IRQ
> > line. The correctness of sharing interrupt for each IRQ line should
> be
> > ensured by the userspace program (QEmu).
> >
> > [Amit: rebase to kvm.git HEAD]
> 
> Hi, Amit
> 
> Thanks for your work! 
> 
> But maybe I miss something. I suppose my later patch can work
> indepently? I 
> think the second patch should solve the whole problem (sorry to reply
> it to 
> the second rather than [0/2] which made confusion...). Can you have a
> check?

I'm not sure I understand. Which concern are you talking about?

I used the latest patch that you sent and I also verified that it works.

Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to