On Monday 13 October 2008 13:06:18 Amit Shah wrote:
> ----- "Sheng Yang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 October 2008 16:10:51 Amit Shah wrote:
> > > From: Sheng Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Keep a record of current interrupt state before injecting. Don't
> > > assert/deassert repeatedly, so that every caller of kvm_set_irq()
> > > can be identified as a separate interrupt source for the IOAPIC/PIC
> > > to implement logical OR of level triggered interrupts on one IRQ
> >
> > line.
> >
> > > Notice that userspace devices are treated as one device for each
> >
> > IRQ
> >
> > > line. The correctness of sharing interrupt for each IRQ line should
> >
> > be
> >
> > > ensured by the userspace program (QEmu).
> > >
> > > [Amit: rebase to kvm.git HEAD]
> >
> > Hi, Amit
> >
> > Thanks for your work!
> >
> > But maybe I miss something. I suppose my later patch can work
> > indepently? I
> > think the second patch should solve the whole problem (sorry to reply
> > it to
> > the second rather than [0/2] which made confusion...). Can you have a
> > check?
>
> I'm not sure I understand. Which concern are you talking about?
>
> I used the latest patch that you sent and I also verified that it works.
>
Well, at least I meant to replace all of my first two patches with my later
one... I suppose the second patch(my later one, derived from Avi's
suggestion) should work alone without the first one...
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
